|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: me (joe
plaguesplace.dyndns.org)Date: Wed May 09 2001 - 19:22:07 CDT
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 04:27:09PM -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote:
> > Nobody is arguing that you have the right to charge a fee
> > for distribution of these packages and can put your own LICENSE for entire
> > distribution as a whole, but putting your own license for binaries when
> > souce code is clearly not under your own copyright is not right.
>
> Proprietary binaries is standard operating procedure for BSD-licensed code. It is clearly a
> violation for GPL'd code, so we don't do it. It's an open question for other licenses, and
> I'm still investigating.
Uugh! Why am I reminded of the bsd -vs- AT&T fiasco?
joe
-- (no fooling, from a microsoft commercial) "...will share freely, and openly." "Always flexible, plays well with others."_______________________________________________ Immunix-users mailing list Immunix-users
mail.wirex.com http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/immunix-users
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]