|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [lids] Re: Secure Linux Distro (fwd)
From: Crazy Man (somejackass
hotmail.com)Date: Sat May 13 2000 - 02:16:10 CDT
- Next message: Tom Vogt: "Re: scary thing :-)"
- Previous message: steve: "Re: scary thing :-)"
- In reply to: Dustin D. Trammell: "Re[2]: [lids] Re: Secure Linux Distro (fwd)"
- Next in thread: Tom Vogt: "Re: Re[2]: [lids] Re: Secure Linux Distro (fwd)"
- Reply: Crazy Man: "Re: Re[2]: [lids] Re: Secure Linux Distro (fwd)"
- Reply: Tom Vogt: "Re: Re[2]: [lids] Re: Secure Linux Distro (fwd)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Here's food for thought: Give the admin / root account a specific copy of
> their favorite shell, then put the full path to that specific shell in
> the hidden process list in LIDS, and enable the hiding of hidden
> processes children. *pOoF* no admin. Of course, at this point, you
> can't see your own processes, but neither can anyone else...
First of all, I'm a new user to Linux so don't flame me if I say/ask
something rather stupid. That out of the way, I'de like to ask what the
difference between an admin acount and a root account is. Or is it just a
different title for the same account?
Dennis
- Next message: Tom Vogt: "Re: scary thing :-)"
- Previous message: steve: "Re: scary thing :-)"
- In reply to: Dustin D. Trammell: "Re[2]: [lids] Re: Secure Linux Distro (fwd)"
- Next in thread: Tom Vogt: "Re: Re[2]: [lids] Re: Secure Linux Distro (fwd)"
- Reply: Crazy Man: "Re: Re[2]: [lids] Re: Secure Linux Distro (fwd)"
- Reply: Tom Vogt: "Re: Re[2]: [lids] Re: Secure Linux Distro (fwd)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]