|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: rpc.statd
From: Anton Opperman (aopperma
faritec.co.za)Date: Mon May 15 2000 - 07:41:32 CDT
- Next message: Joseph S D Yao: "Re: scary thing :-)"
- Previous message: Olaf Kirch: "Re: rpc.statd"
- In reply to: Olaf Kirch: "Re: rpc.statd"
- Reply: Anton Opperman: "Re: rpc.statd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Whoops. You're mixing things up here. The beast you're talking about
> is rpc.rstatd, note the r after the dot.
sorry, you right ... but it just as tedious to program
>> Also, it
>> makes remote (and centralized) monitoring possible, even without any userid
>> on the system. With one collection agent, you could even monitor accross
>> different OS and architecture boundaries.
>
> Sounds a lot like SNMP :-)
does ... getting a bit off track, however, the load to collect the same
data via snmp would be roughly 100 fold. (+/- 13 cpu sec/day/host on a
R40 running AIX)
Anton
- Next message: Joseph S D Yao: "Re: scary thing :-)"
- Previous message: Olaf Kirch: "Re: rpc.statd"
- In reply to: Olaf Kirch: "Re: rpc.statd"
- Reply: Anton Opperman: "Re: rpc.statd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]