|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Another facet of Kerberos insecurity
From: Chris Evans (chris
ferret.lmh.ox.ac.uk)Date: Thu May 18 2000 - 15:39:51 CDT
- Next message: Rafael J. Wysocki: "pam_ldap security"
- Previous message: Simon Wilkinson: "Re: Another facet of Kerberos insecurity"
- In reply to: Simon Wilkinson: "Re: Another facet of Kerberos insecurity"
- Reply: Chris Evans: "Re: Another facet of Kerberos insecurity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Simon Wilkinson wrote:
> > malicious remote site (or compromised big site) could use insecurities in
> > the Kerberos protocol to compromise clients connecting with these
> > "kerberized" binaries?
>
> Do you mean insecurities in the protocol, or insecurities in the MIT
> implementation of the protocol? I took from your last post that the
In the MIT implementation of the protocol; sorry for confusion.
Chris
- Next message: Rafael J. Wysocki: "pam_ldap security"
- Previous message: Simon Wilkinson: "Re: Another facet of Kerberos insecurity"
- In reply to: Simon Wilkinson: "Re: Another facet of Kerberos insecurity"
- Reply: Chris Evans: "Re: Another facet of Kerberos insecurity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]