|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: write(1) security (was: Re: Here's another glibc env. var.)
From: Andries.Brouwer
cwi.nlDate: Sat May 27 2000 - 13:51:18 CDT
- Next message: Sean Hunter: "[RFC] environment sanitisation wrapper"
- Previous message: Cooper: "Re: [RFC] environment sanitisation wrapper"
- Maybe in reply to: Joseph S. Myers: "write(1) security (was: Re: Here's another glibc env. var.)"
- Next in thread: Kev: "Re: Here's another glibc env. var."
- Next in thread: haradaobunsha.co.jp: "Re: Here's another glibc env. var."
- Maybe reply: Andries.Brouwercwi.nl: "Re: write(1) security (was: Re: Here's another glibc env. var.)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> The Single Unix Specification adds the wording
> If the recipient's locale does not use an LC_CTYPE equivalent
> to the sender's, the results are undefined.
> Are there any Austin Group members here who can check what the current
> draft says?
The words are identical.
Andries
- Next message: Sean Hunter: "[RFC] environment sanitisation wrapper"
- Previous message: Cooper: "Re: [RFC] environment sanitisation wrapper"
- Maybe in reply to: Joseph S. Myers: "write(1) security (was: Re: Here's another glibc env. var.)"
- Next in thread: Kev: "Re: Here's another glibc env. var."
- Next in thread: haradaobunsha.co.jp: "Re: Here's another glibc env. var."
- Maybe reply: Andries.Brouwercwi.nl: "Re: write(1) security (was: Re: Here's another glibc env. var.)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]