|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: M$ code audit? ;-)
From: Len Budney (lbudney-lists-audit
nb.net)Date: Mon Oct 30 2000 - 08:03:44 CST
- Next message: Maurycy Prodeus: "Local problem with Apache"
- Next message: security-audit-help
ferret.lmh.ox.ac.uk: "ezmlm warning"
- Previous message: Andreas Hasenack: "Re: M$ code audit? ;-)"
- In reply to: Andreas Hasenack: "Re: M$ code audit? ;-)"
- Next in thread: Crispin Cowan: "Re: M$ code audit? ;-)"
- Reply: Len Budney: "Re: M$ code audit? ;-)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andreas Hasenack <andreas
conectiva.com.br> wrote:
>
> This is getting off-topic, but I couldn't resist. What if the inverse
> happens? Someone finds GPL code in there...?
Then Stallman can sue Microsoft and make them release all of their code.
And don't think he won't do it! (But will he accept a settlement for a
few million dollars out of court? I sure hope not!)
Len.
-- It's always difficult to imagine the effects of a free market when you've never tried one. -- Dan Bernstein
- Next message: Maurycy Prodeus: "Local problem with Apache"
- Next message: security-audit-help
ferret.lmh.ox.ac.uk: "ezmlm warning"
- Previous message: Andreas Hasenack: "Re: M$ code audit? ;-)"
- In reply to: Andreas Hasenack: "Re: M$ code audit? ;-)"
- Next in thread: Crispin Cowan: "Re: M$ code audit? ;-)"
- Reply: Len Budney: "Re: M$ code audit? ;-)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]