Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email email@example.com
From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG (tbbecket.net)
Date: Fri Jan 11 2002 - 12:15:10 CST
Felix von Leitner <felix-secauditfefe.de> writes:
> > 1) These functions exist in BSD libc, which used to be a sufficient
> > argument all by itself for why they should in glibc.
> > 2) These functions are in growing use by many programs.
> What, bcopy? In growing use?
No, strlcpy is in growing use. Or can't you keep track of the
argument well enough to know which function is which?
> > So, to summarize:
> > 1) We should not add these functions because it will make glibc a tiny
> > bit slower. (Linus)
> > 2) We should not add these functions because we don't really care
> > about tiny improvements in speed. (Kaz)
> > Can you pick a single story and keep it straight?
> Thomas, we have perfectly good arguments.
> You don't have to invent new ones which look easier to ridicule or
Huh? What's the argument? The two immediately quoted above have in
fact been raised, and they are directly contradictory to each other.
Now you've raised another, which is that somehow adding a function
that many people already use will actually *decrease* portability.
That's a new one, but it's also false.