|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Vincent Danen (vdanen
mandrakesoft.com)Date: Fri Feb 01 2002 - 21:56:25 CST
Just asking for opinions here. A few people were somewhat annoyed
with the list not being an "open list" (ie. anyone can send to the
list). The list is currently subscriber-only and posts to the list
from non-subscribers need to be approved by myself.
Unfortunately, each of the mandrakesecure.net lists have received
numerous pieces of spam since they came online. Fortunately, the list
was subscriber-only so I could reject the posts.
However, the problem is that sometimes posts are delayed because I
have to manually approve them. So now I've come up with another idea
that I wanted to bounce off of those on the list.
Some of you may have read my article on TMDA posted on MandrakeSecure
in December, describing it as a really good anti-SPAM solution. I've
been using it for quite a while and it works awesome. I also think I
can plug it into ezmlm so that people posting to the list would have
to confirm their message prior to it being accepted by the list; the
premise being, of course, that spammers never respond to their
messages.
The drawback is that non-subscribers are asked to confirm their
message prior to posting, which results in delays. The benefit is
that these delays are shorter than if I approved the message
manually. Also, once confirmed, the sender would go into a permanent
whitelist and subsequent posts would not require confirmation. New
subscribers would have to go through the process once and never
again. Existing memberlists would get piped into the whitelist so
current subscribers will never have to confirm a message.
WDYT? I'm thinking of implementing this using a shared whitelist for
all mandrakesecure.net mailing lists. Ie. if you post to discuss
and
confirm your message once, you can post to qmail
or snf
and never
have to see another confirmation message.
I'd like to know if you guys think this is a good or bad idea, or if
you couldn't care less either way. =) Thanks!
-- MandrakeSoft Security, OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net 1024D/FE6F2AFD 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFDCurrent Linux kernel 2.4.8-34.1mdk uptime: 10 days 1 hour 37 minutes.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8W2NpIEPQ5f5vKv0RAgilAJ9d5YRcX4wAol0H8kkDWGESgdIC3gCfb8VA SL3wTy5Tx5UM4QvL7bmc3SA= =GJrI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]