|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: [suse-security] SuSE: traceroute
From: Ingo Kloecker (ingo
mathA.rwth-aachen.de)Date: Mon Oct 02 2000 - 07:10:41 CDT
- Next message: Martin Leweling: "RE: [suse-security] SuSE: traceroute"
- Previous message: bolo
lupa.de: "RE: [suse-security] SuSE: traceroute"
- In reply to: bolo
lupa.de: "RE: [suse-security] SuSE: traceroute"
- Next in thread: Martin Leweling: "RE: [suse-security] SuSE: traceroute"
- Reply: Ingo Kloecker: "Re: [suse-security] SuSE: traceroute"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bolo
lupa.de wrote:
>The traceroute version we use on several of our boxes running SuSE 6.0
> -> 6.2 (1.4a5) segfaults by issuing the traceroute command line
> mentioned above. Is this (SuSE-)traceroute version really
> unsusceptible of being exploited with some piece of evil code? Why?
At least SuSE 6.4 doesn't contain the LBNL traceroute anymore but
another implementation of traceroute as Roman already said. This
version seems to be safe.
Ingo
-- ---------------------------- Ingo Klöcker Lehrstuhl A für Mathematik RWTH Aachen 52056 Aachen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-security-unsubscribe
suse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help
suse.com
- Next message: Martin Leweling: "RE: [suse-security] SuSE: traceroute"
- Previous message: bolo
lupa.de: "RE: [suse-security] SuSE: traceroute"
- In reply to: bolo
lupa.de: "RE: [suse-security] SuSE: traceroute"
- Next in thread: Martin Leweling: "RE: [suse-security] SuSE: traceroute"
- Reply: Ingo Kloecker: "Re: [suse-security] SuSE: traceroute"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]