Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email email@example.com
From: Oyku Gencay (oykugsbt.com.tr)
Date: Tue Jul 31 2001 - 12:48:10 CDT
Sorry for the error :) I intended to write "crashes" not "crashed". Both
BIND8 and 9 frequently (at least once in two days) crashes. BIND 4 was
unsecure, but not so unstable.
----- Original Message -----
From: Schelstraete Bart <bschelstbru-hub.dhl.com>
To: Oyku Gencay <oykugsbt.com.tr>
Cc: SuSE Security <suse-securitysuse.de>
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 12:41 AM
Subject: Re: [suse-security] DNS: BIND vs djbdns
> Oyku Gencay wrote:
> >I'm wondering, does anyone of you are using djbdns
> >(http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html) instead of BIND? What are your thoughts.
> >from being vulnerable, BIND frequently crashed.
> BIND crashed? That's strange.........I never had any problems with
> running BIND.
> I think BIND is the most complete - stablest - nameserver.
> (If you don't mind the security issues )
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-security-unsubscribesuse.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-helpsuse.com
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-security-unsubscribesuse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-helpsuse.com