OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Oyku Gencay (oykugsbt.com.tr)
Date: Tue Jul 31 2001 - 12:48:10 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Sorry for the error :) I intended to write "crashes" not "crashed". Both
    BIND8 and 9 frequently (at least once in two days) crashes. BIND 4 was
    unsecure, but not so unstable.

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Schelstraete Bart <bschelstbru-hub.dhl.com>
    To: Oyku Gencay <oykugsbt.com.tr>
    Cc: SuSE Security <suse-securitysuse.de>
    Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 12:41 AM
    Subject: Re: [suse-security] DNS: BIND vs djbdns

    > Oyku Gencay wrote:
    >
    > >Hi,
    > >
    > >I'm wondering, does anyone of you are using djbdns
    > >(http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html) instead of BIND? What are your thoughts.
    Apart
    > >from being vulnerable, BIND frequently crashed.
    > >
    > BIND crashed? That's strange.........I never had any problems with
    > running BIND.
    > I think BIND is the most complete - stablest - nameserver.
    >
    > (If you don't mind the security issues )
    >
    > Bart
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > --
    > To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-security-unsubscribesuse.com
    > For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-helpsuse.com 

    -- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-security-unsubscribesuse.com
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-helpsuse.com