Na, I didn't BCC. But, I think they can read it now.

---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Re: [suse-security] sendmail
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 23:13:48 -0500
From: Avi Schwartz <aviCFFtechnologies.com>
To: phil <philosbtown.com>

Well, unless you BCCed the list, only you and me read this :-)

Avi

--On Sunday, August 26, 2001 08:59:23 PM -0700 phil <philosbtown.com>

wrote:
> Thanks again.
>
> Just to be fully clear about this to others who may read this thread, I
> did have to update postfix to postfix-20010228pl03-5.i386.rpm
> which was 1894387 bytes.
>
> So if we got that version of postfix and that "sendmail symlink" thingy
> called sendmail then we are cool for now. (As of whatever day this is.)
>
> btw - I only noticed it because of some perl scripts that deal with the
> mail.
>
> I just wanted it to be clear for others.
>
> On Sunday 26 August 2001 08:14 pm, you wrote:
>> No harm at all. Better safe then sorry ;-)
>>
>> Avi
>>
>> --On Sunday, August 26, 2001 08:09:16 PM -0700 phil <philosbtown.com>
>>
>> wrote:
>> > Thanks Very much
>> >
>> > That is pretty much what I thought. Some kind of symlink. Just
>> > checking though to be sure. No harm in that eh?
>> >
>> > On Sunday 26 August 2001 07:51 pm, you wrote:
>> >> Type man sendmail (and assuming you don't have the real sendmail
>> >> installed you will get:
>> >>
>> >> sendmail - Postfix to Sendmail compatibility interface
>> >>
>> >> Basically it is an interface allowing programs that expect sendmail to
>> >> continue to be happy even when sendmail is not around.
>> >>
>> >> Avi

--
Avi Schwartz
aviCFFtechnologies.com
"I have to share the credit. I invented it, but Bill made it
famous." - IBM engineer Dave Bradley describing the
control-alt-delete reboot sequence
-------------------------------------------------------
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-security-unsubscribesuse.com
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-helpsuse.com

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]