OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Gerhard Sittig (Gerhard.Sittiggmx.net)
Date: Fri May 17 2002 - 12:46:47 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 14:18 -0700, Christopher Mahmood wrote:
    >
    > * Gerhard Sittig (Gerhard.Sittiggmx.net) [020516 13:16]:
    > > Huh? Didn't we recently have one of these regularly scheduled
    > > DJBware threads?
    >
    > Well, yes OK. I almost wrote "with exception of DJB..." but didn't
    > want to start another thread like that.
    >
    > DJB's guarantee is maybe better described as a $500 reward for
    > finding holes.

    If this is not a warranty, how else would you define one? Not
    only do you get back all the money you invested ($0 for the
    software) but on top you get even more (the reward for finding
    the hole, paid out of DJB's own pockets). And -- what hasn't
    been mentioned above -- the author assures you that the tools
    work as designed and announced if you use what the author
    released and install it in the way the author told you to. This
    is IMHO an adequate request for the provided service. (BTW:
    SuSE wouldn't like to support anything the user modified either,
    would they? Let's not talk about taking responsibility for
    things which are not under your control ... Modifying source
    code and locations probably voids your support request as well
    as throwing switches in delivered sources (the kernel) makes
    the user responsible for his own action. And I'm sure SuSE
    wouldn't like to have a publisher grab their distro, manipulate
    it, tack it to a newspaper and still call it a SuSE distro
    while things might not work and it's not SuSE's fault at all.)

    Admittedly a warranty doesn't make bugs and problems go away
    magically. But when a vendor writes "there is no problem within
    the software and I'm so certain about it that I state this
    publically and return (and add) money in case I'm wrong" does
    it reflect the vendor's position (commitment) towards his product
    and raises your faith. And when the vendor is held responsible
    for being wrong, he will make sure it happens rarely or not at
    all. The above warranty is not a "best effort" statement.

    I'm not saying that software automatically is crap when there's
    no warranty coming with it. But I'm easier using software which
    is accompanied by one. Especially in the sensitive environment
    we are talking about.

    virtually yours 82D1 9B9C 01DC 4FB4 D7B4 61BE 3F49 4F77 72DE DA76
    Gerhard Sittig true | mail -s "get gpg key" Gerhard.Sittiggmx.net

    -- 
         If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above
                 ask your parents or an adult to help you.
    

    -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-security-unsubscribesuse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-helpsuse.com Security-related bug reports go to securitysuse.de, not here