|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Uwe Boigs (uboigs
sofia-gmbh.de)Date: Wed Jun 05 2002 - 08:29:50 CDT
Peter van den Heuvel wrote:
> Otherwise the question was not for an alternative but just what
> harm could be in the situation described.
>
> Like it or not, telnet can be a requirement. I've got users from
> locations where ANY form of encrypted network trafic is not
> allowed, just because the company want's to be able to read
> what's on their net. We might disagree with their point of view,
> but over the years I've learnt not to debate multinational
> corporate IT regulations; the human lifespan does simply not
> accomodate for such endeavours.
>
> And since I'm not too sure of an _answer_ myself, anybody smarter
> out there?
Hallo Peter,
of course you're right.
I was just not thinking about that possibility, my fault, but just
in case he doesn't desperately need telnet, he might switch to ssh.
It was just a suggestion and not a way to solve his telnet problem.
cheers
uwe
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-security-unsubscribesuse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help
suse.com Security-related bug reports go to security
suse.de, not here
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]