OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Martin Köhling (mk_at_lw1.cc-computer.de)
Date: Wed Sep 11 2002 - 09:40:05 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Hi!

    On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Roman Drahtmueller wrote:

    > Hi Rob,
    >
    > >
    > > Currently, I am running SuSE 7.3 on the firewall/masquerading/gateway machine
    > > for my home network. I was also running openssh. That was until I ran a
    > > security scan (Nessus 1.0.10) that showed the version of ssh
    > > (openssh-2.9.9p2-103) to be highly vulnerable. So I read the SuSE security
    > > announcements and it seems that the version I have has been patched and all
    > > is well. So, I am secure running openssh 2.9.9p2? Would an updated version
    >
    > To our knowlege, yes.

    What about the recently fixed openssl bugs?

    On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Olaf Kirch wrote :

    >On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:58:43PM +0100, Graham Murray wrote:
    >> Openssh uses openssl. Is openssh vulnerable to any of the openssl
    >> exploits?
    >
    >Potentially, yes. It may be possible to trigger the ASN.1 signedness
    >bug when decoding RSA keys during/after RSA authentication. The other
    >bugs, no, because OpenSSH doesn't use SSL.

    At least on SuSE 7.2, ssh and sshd are *not* dynamically linked against
    the openssl libs - so perhaps they are statically linked and thus still
    vulnerable?!?
    Or don't they use openssl at all?
    (openssh-2.9.9p2-103 was built on Jun 28, a month before the openssl
    announcement!)

    I asked this question before but got no answer... :-(

    Martin

    -- 
    Check the headers for your unsubscription address
    For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-helpsuse.com
    Security-related bug reports go to securitysuse.de, not here