OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Steve Adams (stvaEARTHLINK.NET)
Date: Mon Feb 12 2001 - 17:57:19 CST

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    No, David, I think your understanding is fine. I agree with you that
    with TCP/IP4 larger messages could still be sent and they'd just get
    broken up. My point was that Microsoft might not think it's worth
    sending larger messages, i.e., programming RDR and SRV to use the
    CAP_LARGE SMB commands, unless there was an IPv6 stack in place that
    WON'T break up the messages. Regarding the 1500-byte Ethernet limit
    that you point out, there are media layers that don't break datagrams
    into 1500-byte frames.

    Thanks for the discussion. Hopefully somebody else will join in.

    Steve Adams

    On Fri, 9 Feb 2001 14:45:12 -0800, you wrote:

    >--- Steve Adams <stvaEARTHLINK.NET> wrote:
    >> Could it be that SRV and RDR are
    >> waiting to sense an
    >> IPv6 stack with jumbo payloads?
    >
    >OK, I think I'm getting outside of my territory now,
    >because I don't know anything about IPv6. But I'm not
    >sure if IPv6 should have anything to do with it.
    >
    >With SMB over TCP/IPv4, you should still be able
    >to send a message > 64K, because the stream will be
    >split into multiple IP datagrams and joined up by
    >the recipient's TCP stack.
    >
    >Even if IPv6 supports single datagrams of size > 64K,
    >then that still doesn't mean much because the datagram
    >itself will have to be fragmented to travel over
    >Ethernet, which has a max length of a little less than
    >1500.
    >
    >Anyway, I'm sure I'm misunderstanding the question, so
    >would someone else care to answer it?
    >
    >david
    >
    >----------------------------
    >The statements and opinions expressed here are my own
    >and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    >
    >__________________________________________________
    >Do You Yahoo!?
    >Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
    >a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
    >
    >----------------------------------------------------------------
    >Users Guide http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/essentials/mail.asp
    >contains important info including how to unsubscribe. Save time, search
    >the archives at http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Users Guide http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/essentials/mail.asp
    contains important info including how to unsubscribe. Save time, search
    the archives at http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html