what does FTM and what it is?

Best Regards,
Diaconu Ionut

diaconumarconi.unitbv.ro , m0rpheuszyahoo.com
http://www.jamhadar.net

----- Original Message -----
From: Rick Hobbs <rickNEOWORKS.COM>
To: <DCOMDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: COM+ problem

> We saw a problem like this when we had a COM service (NT Service
> style) which had some objects which aggregated the FTM. This
> worked fine under NT (where the RPC runtime normally runs in
> the MTA if one is there), but under 2000 they had sneakily
> moved RPC to being in the Neutral apartment. Anyway, the
> solution was to make sure that no objects which are going
> to be marshalled outside of the MTA were aggregating the FTM, so
> you might want to check that none of these objects are aggregating
> the FTM.
>
> Whether it is this or not, it is something that is getting in
> the way of the marshalling code. In the above case the FTM was
> kind of shorting out a load of the standard marshaller.
>
> None of this was under COM+, however.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Richard Hobbs.
> Neoworks Limited
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Stepura [mailto:michaelVIMAS.KIEV.UA]
> > Sent: 24 July 2001 09:32
> > To: DCOMDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
> > Subject: COM+ problem
> >
> >
> > Hi All
> >
> > Have some problems with COM+.
> > Situation 1.
> > COM+ Server Application
> > Object1, Single thread apartment, registered in COM+ (requires
> > transaction)
> > Object2, Single thread apartment, not registered in COM+.
> > Implements Interface2.
> > When executing, Object1 creates instance of Object2 and gets
> > Interface2. Everything works OK.
> >
> > Situation 2.
> > COM+ Server Application
> > Object1, Neutral thread apartment, registered in COM+
> > (poolable, requires
> > transaction)
> > Object2, Single thread apartment, not registered in COM+.
> > Implements Interface2.
> > When executing, Object1 successfully creates instance of Object2 and
> > failed when querying Interface2!!!!
> > Querying IUnknown succeeded, and inside Object2->QueryInterface
> > Interface2 is returned, but when returning to Object1 code, the result
> > of QueryInterface is E_NOINTERFACE.
> > Somebody knows what's the problem?
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
> > contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
> > http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
> > To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-requestDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
> contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
> http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
> To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-requestDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM

----------------------------------------------------------------
Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-requestDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]