|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Clay Mayers (clay.mayers
PREVIO.COM)Date: Mon Oct 01 2001 - 12:16:12 CDT
The hot fix works! Or at least one of the fixes in the pre SP3 hot fix
package I got from PSS.
Thanks!
Clay.
-----Original Message-----
From: Riyaz Pishori [mailto:riyazp
MICROSOFT.COM]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 4:41 PM
To: DCOM
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Subject: Re: RPCSS & (80010108)
Try the hotfix first, if that does not work, may be MS PSS folks would
need to dig into in your repro.
Other question, is what is the state of the proxy, i.e. an interface
pointer or just a marshaled stream?
Hope this help,
Riyaz
-----Original Message-----
From: Clay Mayers [mailto:clay.mayers
PREVIO.COM]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 4:02 PM
To: DCOM
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Subject: Re: RPCSS & (80010108)
Well nearly exactly 6 minutes after the object was created 80010108 is
returned. I can't find any dead windows on the system. I wrote a quick
utility to send a broadcast message, it worked fine. Maybe my
assumption
that I can detect a foul STA by broadcasting is incorrect.
I suppose the next thing to try is to get the hot fix from MS.
Clay.
-----Original Message-----
From: Clay Mayers
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 2:00 PM
To: DCOM
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Subject: Re: RPCSS & (80010108)
Thanks! This looks promising as it's win2k only but I would think there
would be other symptoms on the machine if a message queue weren't being
serviced since broadcasted messages would block as well. Perhaps this
mixed
with:
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q189/4/27.ASP
would make MTA's need to pump messages too.
Clay.
-----Original Message-----
From: Riyaz Pishori [mailto:riyazp
MICROSOFT.COM]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 1:04 PM
To: DCOM
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Subject: Re: RPCSS & (80010108)
This KB should help,
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q293/6/31.asp
Hope this helps,
Riyaz
-----Original Message-----
From: Clay Mayers [mailto:clay.mayers
PREVIO.COM]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 10:48 AM
To: DCOM
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Subject: Re: RPCSS & (80010108)
Oops got that backwards - 2k clients nt 4.0 server.
Clay.
-----Original Message-----
From: Clay Mayers
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 9:39 AM
To: DCOM
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Subject: Re: RPCSS & (80010108)
I'm disappointed, as I'm sure you are, that there is no reply to this
one.
We're plagued by this problem as well with NT 4.0 talking to a Win2k
server.
Clay.
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Kilpatrick [mailto:alan.kilpatrick
ATLANTAGA.NCR.COM]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:37 PM
To: DCOM
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Subject: RPCSS & (80010108)
Could someone tell me if/when this was patched in NT 4.0? I'm getting
alot
of the 80010108, RPC_E_DISCONNECTED exceptions from customers that are
running our DCOM application on their NT 4 sp4 machines and I'm trying
to
narrow down the causes.
Thanks,
Alan K.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-request
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
----------------------------------------------------------------
Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-request
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
----------------------------------------------------------------
Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-request
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
----------------------------------------------------------------
Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-request
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
----------------------------------------------------------------
Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-request
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
----------------------------------------------------------------
Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-request
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
----------------------------------------------------------------
Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-request
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
----------------------------------------------------------------
Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-request
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]