OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Clay Mayers (clay.mayersPREVIO.COM)
Date: Mon Oct 01 2001 - 12:16:12 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    The hot fix works! Or at least one of the fixes in the pre SP3 hot fix
    package I got from PSS.

    Thanks!

    Clay.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Riyaz Pishori [mailto:riyazpMICROSOFT.COM]
    Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 4:41 PM
    To: DCOMDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
    Subject: Re: RPCSS & (80010108)

    Try the hotfix first, if that does not work, may be MS PSS folks would
    need to dig into in your repro.
    Other question, is what is the state of the proxy, i.e. an interface
    pointer or just a marshaled stream?

    Hope this help,
    Riyaz

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Clay Mayers [mailto:clay.mayersPREVIO.COM]
    Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 4:02 PM
    To: DCOMDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
    Subject: Re: RPCSS & (80010108)

    Well nearly exactly 6 minutes after the object was created 80010108 is
    returned. I can't find any dead windows on the system. I wrote a quick
    utility to send a broadcast message, it worked fine. Maybe my
    assumption
    that I can detect a foul STA by broadcasting is incorrect.

    I suppose the next thing to try is to get the hot fix from MS.

    Clay.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Clay Mayers
    Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 2:00 PM
    To: DCOMDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
    Subject: Re: RPCSS & (80010108)

    Thanks! This looks promising as it's win2k only but I would think there
    would be other symptoms on the machine if a message queue weren't being
    serviced since broadcasted messages would block as well. Perhaps this
    mixed
    with:

    http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q189/4/27.ASP

    would make MTA's need to pump messages too.

    Clay.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Riyaz Pishori [mailto:riyazpMICROSOFT.COM]
    Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 1:04 PM
    To: DCOMDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
    Subject: Re: RPCSS & (80010108)

    This KB should help,
    http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q293/6/31.asp

    Hope this helps,
    Riyaz

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Clay Mayers [mailto:clay.mayersPREVIO.COM]
    Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 10:48 AM
    To: DCOMDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
    Subject: Re: RPCSS & (80010108)

    Oops got that backwards - 2k clients nt 4.0 server.

    Clay.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Clay Mayers
    Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 9:39 AM
    To: DCOMDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
    Subject: Re: RPCSS & (80010108)

    I'm disappointed, as I'm sure you are, that there is no reply to this
    one.
    We're plagued by this problem as well with NT 4.0 talking to a Win2k
    server.

    Clay.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Alan Kilpatrick [mailto:alan.kilpatrickATLANTAGA.NCR.COM]
    Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:37 PM
    To: DCOMDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
    Subject: RPCSS & (80010108)

    Could someone tell me if/when this was patched in NT 4.0? I'm getting
    alot
    of the 80010108, RPC_E_DISCONNECTED exceptions from customers that are
    running our DCOM application on their NT 4 sp4 machines and I'm trying
    to
    narrow down the causes.

    Thanks,
    Alan K.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
    contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
    http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
    To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-requestDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
    contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
    http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
    To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-requestDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
    contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
    http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
    To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-requestDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
    contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
    http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
    To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-requestDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
    contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
    http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
    To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-requestDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
    contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
    http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
    To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-requestDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
    contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
    http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
    To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-requestDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
    contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
    http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
    To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-requestDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM