Why is it odd - naturally they would have to built something extra that
incurs
this overhead - like the thread pool that was mentioned earlier , unless the
Async RPC support is bulit into one of the transport stacks or some...

----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Swartz <steveswMICROSOFT.COM>
To: <DCOMDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 4:13 AM
Subject: Re: Asynchronous method calls : Need help - not a solution

I don't doubt that MSDn says this somewhere, but I find it odd, since
"normal blocking" RPC is built on top of Async RPC. ;)

-----Original Message-----
From: ArunKumar S [mailto:akumarOMNESYSINDIA.COM]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:24 AM
To: DCOMDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Subject: Re: Asynchronous method calls : Need help - not a solution

Hi

I have been thinking on the same lines myself - would be great if any
of our gurus could help

MSDn says Async RPC is 20-30% slower than normal blocking RPC ....

----------------------------------------------------------------
Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-requestDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM

----------------------------------------------------------------
Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-requestDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]