|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Stephen Sauls (SSAULS_at_OPTO22.COM)
Date: Fri Aug 30 2002 - 10:11:28 CDT
VC++ 6.0
ATL
PII 300
W2K
I created an Inproc ATL COM server, which contains only one very simple
method. The idl file is copied below. In my test client (a simple dialog
application) I perform the following:
for (i = 0; i < 100000; i++){
m_pIScnr->Read(&Value);
}
using GetTickCount() I determined that this loop takes 12500ms.
I also created a standard DLL, which exported one method with the exact same
signature and implementation. I tested it using a similar loop and
determined that the loop took 30ms.
In the settings for the idl file I have "Stubless Proxies" unchecked.
Can someone please explain why the inproc server call takes so long.
Thank you for your time.
import "oaidl.idl";
import "ocidl.idl";
[
object,
uuid(073DA079-0B5B-4C5A-9A84-005DB23EDB04),
helpstring("IScnr_ComCallTest Interface"),
pointer_default(unique)
]
interface IScnr_ComCallTest : IUnknown
{
[helpstring("method Read")] HRESULT Read([out] DWORD*
pValue);
};
[
uuid(CD7FE741-EA6F-401E-8E5E-1A7FE722EF8B),
version(1.0),
helpstring("ComCallTest 1.0 Type Library")
]
library COMCALLTESTLib
{
importlib("stdole32.tlb");
importlib("stdole2.tlb");
[
uuid(F05F5C15-850E-4BB8-909D-CA39E65C3FB3),
helpstring("Scnr_ComCallTest Class")
]
coclass Scnr_ComCallTest
{
[default] interface IScnr_ComCallTest;
};
};
----------------------------------------------------------------
Users Guide http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/mailfaq.asp
contains important info. Save time, search the archives at
http://discuss.microsoft.com/archives/index.html .
To unsubscribe, mailto:DCOM-signoff-request
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]