|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Cheng, Dean (DCheng
POLARISNETWORKS.COM)Date: Mon Jul 09 2001 - 14:26:37 CDT
Vikas,
There are three rules that applicable
to your question. Note these rules
are not tied with your topology example
but instead are general in nature.
1) The IP address on a point-to-point link
is optional, i.e., a point-to-point may
either be a numbered link or an unnumbered
link for OSPF to operate.
2) As an IP router, there requires at least
one interface with IP address assigned.
3) The OSPF Router ID is by default one of
the IP addresses that configured on the
router.
These three rules need to be applied to your
question/topology collectively.
Dean
-----Original Message-----
From: Vikas B. Wadhwani [mailto:wvikas
YAHOO.COM]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 12:20 PM
To: OSPF
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Subject: To numbered or unnumbered
Hello all,
Below is a network of routers to be configured as an
area.It is an independant network and all the nodes
are routers as well as hosts. They originate traffic,
which means they are a source and sink of traffic and
they also forward traffic i.e, behave as routers.The
routers run the OSPF protocol.I want to know whether
the point to point links between them should be
numbered or unnumbered and why.What is the router id
of the node in either case?
Thanks,
-Vikas
0---------0---------0---------0------------0
\ / \ / /
\ / \ / /
\ / \ / /
\ / \ / /
\0---------0 0------------0
\ /
\ /
\0---------------0
=====
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]