OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Umesh_MS (Umesh_MSINFY.COM)
Date: Fri Jul 20 2001 - 06:34:20 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Hi Ilan,
       Thanx again.
        Another doubt I have is abt the RFC1583 comp.If this is disabled we
    have to prune for ASBR entries in the routing table.
        What I understand is pruning means making it to one entry with least
    cost(Largest Areaid).
        Is it right?
    Thanx in advance
    Umesh

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Ilankumaran N [mailto:nilankuascend.com]
    Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 3:53 PM
    To: Umesh_MS
    Subject: RE: [OSPF] FW: Re: Doubt aboutType 5 route calculation

    Yes.. depending on the type of the external route. Look at the external
    type-1 and type-2 definitions in the RFC2328. In any case you will have
    to
    do the cost comparison.

    yes, there is a concept of third-party gateway. i.e, when you, the
    actual
    gateway and to whom you advertise share a common ip-subnet, you can set
    the
    next_hop as the actual gateway while advertising a route to your
    neighbor
    instead of the conventional next-hop-self concept.

    Thanks
    Ilan

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Mailing List [mailto:OSPFDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM]On Behalf Of
    > Umesh_MS
    > Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 3:32 PM
    > To: OSPFDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
    > Subject: [OSPF] FW: Re: Doubt aboutType 5 route calculation
    >
    >
    > Hi Ilan,
    > Thanks for your reply..
    > I got ur point that u have mentioned .I still have a doubt in that
    > section.
    > When forwarding address is zero, should we also go for cost
    > calculation,looking up the rt entry for destination as in 4th,5th,6th
    > point etc in section 16.4 of rfc2328 .If yes then is it only the next
    > hop concept changes here.
    > Please explain me about this.
    > Thanx in advance
    > Umesh
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: ilankumaran
    > Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 3:03 PM
    > To: OSPFDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
    > Subject: Re: Doubt aboutType 5 route calculation
    >
    >
    > When the forwarding address is set to 0.0.0.0, then the exit point for
    > this
    > destination is the ASBR which originated the LSA. Then look up the RT,
    > for
    > an entry to reach the ASBR. If the forwarding address is non-zero,
    then
    > the
    > exit point for this destination is different from the one that
    > originated
    > the LSA. In this case you need to look up your RT for an entry to
    reach
    > the
    > forwarding address.
    >
    > consider,
    >
    > asbr----|
    > | |------fwd
    > |
    > |
    > DUT
    >
    > when asbr imports an external route into your AS, it can set the
    > next_hop
    > (forwarding address) to either itself or a third party gateway (a
    > forwarder). So depending upon what forwarder address being set in the
    > LSA
    > and the type of the external LSA, DUT can calculate the cost to reach
    > external network and select the least one.
    >
    > Thanks
    > Ilan
    >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: Mailing List [mailto:OSPFDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM]On Behalf Of
    > > Umesh_MS
    > > Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 2:15 PM
    > > To: OSPFDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
    > > Subject: [OSPF] Doubt aboutType 5 route calculation
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Hi,
    > > In section 16.4 of ASExternal route calculation in RFC 2328,I am
    not
    > > very clear with what to be done when forwarding address is zero and
    > when
    > > it is non-zero.
    > > Should we only compare routes when the forwarding address is non
    zero
    > or
    > > must be done for even when the forwarding address is zero.
    > > Point 3 and 4 are they related with forwarding address in this
    > section.
    > >
    > > Thanx in advance
    > > Umesh
    > >
    >