|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Ravichandran M (ravicm
FUTURE.FUTSOFT.COM)Date: Mon Jul 23 2001 - 01:32:14 CDT
Dear edyi,
Please find my response inlined for two of the queries.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mailing List [mailto:OSPF
discuss.microsoft.com]On Behalf Of edyi
Sent: Saturday, 21 July 2001 7:15 PM
To: OSPF
discuss.microsoft.com
Subject: 4 questions about routing and ip addressing
question about routing and ip addressing
Hello everyone, I have some questions about routing:
1. can i run different type of routing daemons simultaneously on one
physical interface? does it have any practical meaning? and how do i mix the
routes getting from different routing protocol together, is there any
metric/distance transform i should do? (if possible,please refer to the
corresponding rfc)
Ravi>> For me it looks meaningless. Mostly there will be only one routing
protocol running in one interface.
2. i know we can bind serval ip addresses to a single physical
interface and that is called alias,but can we bind severval physical
interface to one ip address ? and what is the practical meaning
of alias and severval physical interface with one ip address?
(if possible, please refer to the corresponding rfc)
3. which rfc documents the route redistribute discipline?
Ravi>> Please refer to RFC 1745 for redistribution between BGP & OSPF. There
is no draft/RFC for distribution between RIP & other RPs. Even RFC 1745 is
been made recently "historic".
4. i don't have router in hand, just one PC, how can i test the
correctness of my implementation of the routing protocol?
Huu.....
Waiting for your kindness help.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]