OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Ravichandran M (ravicmFUTURE.FUTSOFT.COM)
Date: Mon Jul 23 2001 - 01:32:14 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Dear edyi,
    Please find my response inlined for two of the queries.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Mailing List [mailto:OSPFdiscuss.microsoft.com]On Behalf Of edyi
    Sent: Saturday, 21 July 2001 7:15 PM
    To: OSPFdiscuss.microsoft.com
    Subject: 4 questions about routing and ip addressing

    question about routing and ip addressing

    Hello everyone, I have some questions about routing:
    1. can i run different type of routing daemons simultaneously on one
    physical interface? does it have any practical meaning? and how do i mix the
    routes getting from different routing protocol together, is there any
    metric/distance transform i should do? (if possible,please refer to the
    corresponding rfc)
    Ravi>> For me it looks meaningless. Mostly there will be only one routing
    protocol running in one interface.

    2. i know we can bind serval ip addresses to a single physical
    interface and that is called alias,but can we bind severval physical
    interface to one ip address ? and what is the practical meaning
    of alias and severval physical interface with one ip address?
    (if possible, please refer to the corresponding rfc)

    3. which rfc documents the route redistribute discipline?
    Ravi>> Please refer to RFC 1745 for redistribution between BGP & OSPF. There
    is no draft/RFC for distribution between RIP & other RPs. Even RFC 1745 is
    been made recently "historic".

    4. i don't have router in hand, just one PC, how can i test the
    correctness of my implementation of the routing protocol?

    Huu.....
    Waiting for your kindness help.