|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Alex Zinin (azinin
NEXSI.COM)Date: Mon Jul 23 2001 - 04:59:17 CDT
edyi,
> question about routing and ip addressing
> Hello everyone, I have some questions about routing:
> 1. can i run different type of routing daemons simultaneously on one physical interface? does it have any practical meaning? and how do i mix the routes getting from different routing protocol
> together, is there any metric/distance transform i should do? (if possible,please refer to the corresponding rfc)
It is possible, but (as mentioned on the list) is useful
in rare situations. Where it can be useful however, is
where you have non-overlapping sets of neighbors for each
protocol instance, even though they all are reachable through
the same interface.
> 2. i know we can bind serval ip addresses to a single physical
> interface and that is called alias,but can we bind severval physical
> interface to one ip address ? and what is the practical meaning
> of alias and severval physical interface with one ip address?
> (if possible, please refer to the corresponding rfc)
Something like this is possible with the unnumbered option
for p2p links. In this case you assign a single IP address
to the box and refer all p2p links to it. This address is
used as the src/dst address for packets locally originate/received.
> 3. which rfc documents the route redistribute discipline?
> 4. i don't have router in hand, just one PC, how can i test the
> correctness of my implementation of the routing protocol?
If you're using UNIX, you could potentially write a pseudo-interface
driver and use it to simulate a network topology with multiple
processes, each representing a single router.
Alex.
> Huu.....
> Waiting for your kindness help.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]