|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Ilankumaran N (ilankumaran
INFY.COM)Date: Tue Jul 31 2001 - 01:01:34 CDT
An ABR need not be connected to the backbone.
This issue was discussed in detail in this forum sometime back. Please refer
to those archives.
I would suggest you to have a look at the draft
draft-ietf-ospf-abr-alt-04.txt too.
Thanks
Ilan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mailing List [mailto:OSPF
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM]On Behalf Of sdf
> sdaf
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 11:22 AM
> To: OSPF
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
> Subject: [OSPF] about ABR
>
>
> Hi...
> i have a doubt about the definition of ABR in rfc2328
> According to 2328 a ABR should be connected to
> bankbone..(i thibk i am right)
> if it is not connected to backbone we must use one
> virtual link to connect the ABR to backbone..i think
> all of you are agree with this...
> But in cisco document i see that a ABR ned not connect
> to backbone..So if we implement rfc 2328 will it work
> with cisco routers...most probably it will result in
> some packet loss..
> if this is right anybody can suggest an answer for
> this problemm..we are implementing rfc 2328....
>
> thanks
> kannan
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
> http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
>
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]