OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Bin Liu (benbin2001HOTMAIL.COM)
Date: Tue Aug 07 2001 - 17:33:08 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Hi everyone,

    Thanks for people's help in my question 1 and 3. I am still looking forward to
    getting your help in my question about IntTranDelay. I rewrite the question
    here to try to make it clearer :)

    In RFC1131, the sample value of the IntTranDelay is 1 second. Could anyone
    tell me how this sample value is computed/defined. I think that, in a high
    speed network, a time delay in the order of second would cost too much since
    such delay happens in every hop of LSA reliable flooding .

    Using an example to explain my opinion :) Router a and b are in the same
    OSPF routing area. Assuming they are H hops away. Consequently, any LSA
    from b to a will take at least H seconds according to the sample
    InfTransDelay value. If a is transmitting some files at the speed of 50M
    bps to b when b starts to flood its "DOWN_in_1_second" state information
    throughout the area, router a will not stop its tranmission until H seconds later
    (at least) . It means that there are (H-1)*50 Mb lost.

    In Jim Gray's "the cost of messages" (1988 ACM), the delay of sending or
    receiving a message is in the order of millisecond. So my queston is why the
    sample value of IntTranDelay in OSPF is set to be 1 second?

    My guess is that, since each Link State Update packet can only carry the
    LSAs one hop further away from their original point, each intermediate router
    has to prepare the new Link State Update packet . This packet preparing time
    dominates the IntTranDelay (in each hop) of the OSPF reliable flooding. If my
    guess is true, then there are two consequent questions: what is the benefit for
    OSPF to only allow the LSU packets carry LSAs one hop away? How to
    prove this benefit is large enough to cover the pay of the additional delay (i.e.,
    the packet preparing time in each intermediate router)?

    A good dynamic routing scheme should be able to make routers adapt
    themselves to environment changes very quickly; and this can only be
    achieved by a short end-to-end LSA (i.e., routing state) transmission delay.

    Also, where can I get the experiment statistics for the time delays in OSPF
    (or any other routing protocol)? Such as the value of IntTranDelay in real
    network, how much is the acceptable limitation for the end-to-end LSA
    transmission delay, or what is the order of the time for preparing a new LSA
    packet.

    That's it. Sorry for so many questions in this email :) Thanks for everybody's
    time and thank you for your help in advance.

    All the best

    yours
    Bin