OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Xie, Feng (Feng.XieMARCONI.COM)
Date: Thu Aug 23 2001 - 08:36:55 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Hi, Alex:

        Usually, we only keep the best route to a destination. As you said, at
    any time, there may be only one entry for an ASBR with multiple next hops
    due to equal-cost multipath. My understanding is that what described in the
    RFC is a process to build the best route to an ASBR when you have choice
    among multiple routes. It does not mean that an implementation has to keep
    all possible routes to an ASBR.

    Feng Xie

    -----Original Message-----
    From: alex lerin [mailto:alexlerinYAHOO.COM]
    Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 5:43 AM
    To: OSPFDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
    Subject: About ASExternal calculation

    Hi..
    I have a doubt in ASExternal Calculation...

      In ASExternal calculations of RFC2328, Section
    16.4,3rd point 3rd paragraph,it says that if the
    forwarding address is zero,th packet should be sent to
    the ASBR itself.Also it says that we have to prune for
    multiple entries.
      My doubt is that how can we prune when there is
    always only one entry for the ASBR in the routing
    table.Because whenever we get a destination ,we check
    for its entry in the routing table and compare the
    path type etc.,and if thay are equal cost we only add
    the next hop entry to the route and not a different
    entry.So there is no possibility for multiple entries
    for the same ASBR in the routing table.
      If I am wrong tell me when can there be more than
    one entries for the same ASBR in the routing table?

      Thanks in advance
      Alex

    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
    http://phonecard.yahoo.com/