|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Dave Katz (dkatz
JUNIPER.NET)Date: Tue Aug 28 2001 - 12:50:15 CDT
Of course, if the refreshes are perfectly spread out across time and
perfectly batched, the actual update transmission rate is on the
order of one packet per second.
X-JNPR-Received-From: outside
X-Apparently-From: <swatirstogi
yahoo.com>
From: "Swati Rastogi" <swatirstogi
yahoo.com>
Cc: <OSPF
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 15:49:12 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Aug 2001 10:15:44.0969 (UTC) FILETIME=[6642E390:01C12FAA]
Hi,
There is an age field in OSPF which is an architectural constant set to one
hour. 1 hour seems like a long time but if we infact redistribute full BGP
routing into OSPF we will be then refreshing at a very fast rate. I want to
know as to how we arrive at the figure that with about 80,000 LSAs we
require a refresh of every 23ms (As given by Dave Katz on Nanog)
Thanks a lot
Swati
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free
yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]