OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Curtis Call (curtiscallUSA.NET)
Date: Tue Sep 04 2001 - 09:04:21 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    See section 2.4.2:

    Each sub-TLV may occur only once. Unrecognized types are ignored.
    All of the defined sub-TLVs are mandatory (though future sub-TLVs may
    not necessarily be mandatory.)

    So you should never encounter the situation you described. (A TE LSA minus
    the metric sub-TLV).

    Bart Batsleer <bart.batsleerALCATEL.BE> wrote:
    > Hello,
    >
    > Hello,
    >
    > I have 2 questions on the draft-katz-yeung-ospf-traffic-05
    >
    > 1) In case the traffic engineering metric sub-tlv is not present in the
    link
    > tlv, does the traffic engineering SPF calculation have to rely on the
    > standard OSPF link metric ?
    >
    > 2) The behaviour is stated in the corresponding isis draft, is there a
    > reason why this is not stated in the OSPF draft ?
    >
    > Thanks in advance,
    > Bart