Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email email@example.com
From: Acee Lindem (aceeREDBACK.COM)
Date: Mon Mar 11 2002 - 12:36:22 CST
Manral, Vishwas wrote:
>>Independent of any implementation considerations, one point Pat and
>>I have never come to agreement on is whether or not the existing
>>mechanisms are sufficient to utilize a single physical interface in
>>multiple areas. IMHO, this is the main issue with this draft.
> Though I still havent been able to look at the latest version of the draft,
> I guess the issue besides being whether existing methods suffice, is a trade
> off between extra code/fuctionality verses simplicity over existing methods
> for folks to deploy?
Close - I say it is more a trade-off between extra code and greater complexity
versus less code and simplicity.
>>From Pat's intro mail on the draft:-
>>sub-interfacing, GREs, VLANS,... etc, are ghastly cumbersome and
>>unwieldy tools, especially when you need lots of them on a single
>>border router. Please consider the plight of folk that deploy OSPF
>>implementations and give this draft serious consideration!!!