OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Acee Lindem (aceeREDBACK.COM)
Date: Mon Apr 29 2002 - 10:18:55 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Anton,

    Along these same lines there is also:

    http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-isis-igp-p2p-over-lan-00.txt

    Of course, to hide the network completely you have to treat the ethernet
    as an unnumbered point-to-point interface.

    Anton Smirnov wrote:
    > Markus,
    > if I understood correctly, by 'hiding' the network you mean announcing it
    > in a way that all non connected routers know about the link and may use it
    > for transit traffic but are not aware of addressing associated with the
    > network.
    > If above is correct then it is very easy to achieve. Just announce this
    > broadcast link in type-1 LSAs of both connected routers as type-1 link (you
    > wrote there are two routers on the link, right?). This change is seamless
    > for all non-connected routers. For connected routers it will require minor
    > changes in LSA origination code and, may be, in SPF code to calculate
    > correctly next hop information.
    >
    > Couple of years ago I played with this mechanism to achieve LSDB size
    > reduction for networks actively using broadcast media to interconnect two
    > routers (say, Ethernet crossover connections between routers). Goal was
    > different from what you are trying to achieve, because accent was on
    > autoconfiguration of the feature without involving much additional
    > signaling, and transit network addressing was still announced. But I
    > remember that actual code changes for this feature were very minimal. That
    > time I half-wrote a paper about this mechanism. If you are interested I can
    > find it, though I don't think it is of much help for your task.
    >
    > Anton
    >
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "Markus Prison" <mprisonGIGA-STREAM.DE>
    > To: <OSPFDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
    > Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 16:11
    > Subject: [OSPF] AW: Hide a network between two routers
    >
    >
    >
    >>Hi Acee,
    >>
    >>it will be a single broadcast network betweeen this two routers.
    >>For ther routers around them it should look that there is no network
    >>
    > between
    >
    >>them.
    >>
    >>What do you meen with tunnel?
    >>
    >>Markus
    >>
    >>-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
    >>Von: Mailing List [mailto:OSPFDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM]Im Auftrag von Acee
    >>Lindem
    >>Gesendet: Freitag, 26. April 2002 15:55
    >>An: OSPFDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
    >>Betreff: Re: Hide a network between two routers
    >>
    >>
    >>Markus Prison wrote:
    >>
    >>>Hi people,
    >>>
    >>>my question will be if it's possible to hide a network between two
    >>>
    > routers
    >
    >>>for the routers that are connected to them within the ospf standard.
    >>>
    >>What do you mean by hide - is it a single network? The simple answer would
    >>be to configure a tunnel between the two routers and run OSPF over the
    >>tunnel rather than the physical network you are trying to hide.
    >>
    >>
    >>>When it's not possible what do you suggest what changes i must do in my
    >>>ospf code of the two routers.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >>--
    >>Acee
    >>
    >>
    >

    --
    Acee