|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Suvani Kaura (bg24096_at_YAHOO.COM)
Date: Wed Jul 24 2002 - 13:45:16 CDT
Thanks Sina & Acee.
--- Sina Mirtorabi <sina
CISCO.COM> wrote:
> > Only for Stub areas unknown LSAs with U-bit == 1
> > should not be advertised in Updates & DDs, and seq.
> > num mismatch event be generated upon their receipt in DDs.
>
> the LSA should have U bit set to 0 and link-local or area wide
> flooding scope in order to be flooded into Stub area
> although it is not mentioned explicitly but if the above condition
> is not satisfied SeqNumberMismatch should be generated
>
> > The rule about AS-wide LSAs still applies to both stub areas &
> > virtual links. Right?
>
> for Stub yes for VL as Acee said it is not explicitly mentioned in
> the RFC 2328 further type 5 flooding are not flooded over VL in
> order to avoid duplicating of effort ( they are already flooded
> though the Transit area ) and Not because it is not allowed to be
> flooded as in case of Stub area
>
> Sina
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]