|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Sina Mirtorabi (sina_at_CISCO.COM)
Date: Wed Oct 09 2002 - 17:35:37 CDT
Suvani
To add to what Yasu already said, re-advertising with zero prefix behavior
could further not work in all cases ( so not a generic solution )
for example when you your router has some prefix with AL bit set ( /128)
then those prefixes are Not added to intra-area prefix referencing network
LSA and you have to keep it in intra-area prefix referncing a Router LSA,
therefore you have to maxage only some prefixes but not all of them ..
Sina
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mailing List [mailto:OSPF
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM]On Behalf Of
> Suvani Kaura
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:42 AM
> To: OSPF
DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
> Subject: OSPFv3 Intra area prefix LSA
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Is it legal for an Intra Area Prefix LSA to be advertised with zero
> prefixes?
>
> Case in point: if a router with a single interface running OSPFv3 is
> DR but there is no active router on that link, it originates an intra
> area prefix lsa referencing its router LSA. Subsequently another
> router (DR-other) comes up on that link, & therefore the DR
> originates a Network LSA & moves the prefix information to the intra
> area prefix lsa referencing the network LSA. Should it now withdraw
> its old intra area prefix lsa referencing the router LSA or should it
> re-advertise it with zero prefixes?
>
> Thanks for your input,
> Suvani
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
> http://faith.yahoo.com
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]