OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Sina Mirtorabi (sina_at_CISCO.COM)
Date: Wed Oct 09 2002 - 17:35:37 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Suvani

    To add to what Yasu already said, re-advertising with zero prefix behavior
    could further not work in all cases ( so not a generic solution )
    for example when you your router has some prefix with AL bit set ( /128)
    then those prefixes are Not added to intra-area prefix referencing network
    LSA and you have to keep it in intra-area prefix referncing a Router LSA,
    therefore you have to maxage only some prefixes but not all of them ..

    Sina

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Mailing List [mailto:OSPFDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM]On Behalf Of
    > Suvani Kaura
    > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:42 AM
    > To: OSPFDISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
    > Subject: OSPFv3 Intra area prefix LSA
    >
    >
    > Hi All,
    >
    > Is it legal for an Intra Area Prefix LSA to be advertised with zero
    > prefixes?
    >
    > Case in point: if a router with a single interface running OSPFv3 is
    > DR but there is no active router on that link, it originates an intra
    > area prefix lsa referencing its router LSA. Subsequently another
    > router (DR-other) comes up on that link, & therefore the DR
    > originates a Network LSA & moves the prefix information to the intra
    > area prefix lsa referencing the network LSA. Should it now withdraw
    > its old intra area prefix lsa referencing the router LSA or should it
    > re-advertise it with zero prefixes?
    >
    > Thanks for your input,
    > Suvani
    >
    > __________________________________________________
    > Do you Yahoo!?
    > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
    > http://faith.yahoo.com