OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Pyda Srisuresh (srisuresh_at_YAHOO.COM)
Date: Thu Dec 12 2002 - 09:39:52 CST

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Rohit,

    I am taking te-wg off the mail list as the following
    discussion pertains to OSPF WG only.

    I was not present at the Atlanta IETF. But, I looked
    at the work group minutes posted on 12/11. The minutes
    say that MOSPF and OSPF-flooding reduction are beign dropped
    from the charter. I saw no mention of alternate ospf-te
    proposals from being dropped.

    Same thing goes for the mailing list. I am not aware of any
    discussion on the list suggesting alternate ospf-te proposals
    being dropped from the charter.

    If the WG charter is to cover the OSPF for TE and non-TE, the
    charter must include discussion of multiple ospf-te proposals.
    If the charter is written to imply that it covers Opaque LSA
    based TE extensions only and no alternate ospf-te proposals, then
    such an implication is not apparent and should be discussed.
    katz-yeung draft has several shortcomings, hasnt completed the
    IETF last call and is not an RFC yet. To presuppose the
    katz-yeung draft to be the only viable TE protocol and to
    exclude alternate proposals is a mistake, IMHO.

    Would appreciate your posting the exact wording of the updated
    charter for the WG on the mailing list.

    regards,
    suresh

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Rohit Dube [mailto:rohitxebeo.com]
    Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 5:38 AM
    To: Jim Boyle
    Cc: Pyda Srisuresh; te-wgops.ietf.org; pjosephForce10Networks.com;
    aceeredback.com; zininpsg.com; fennerresearch.att.com
    Subject: Re: draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-04.txt

    FWIW,

    The katz-yeung ospf-te draft is scheduled to go to ietf-wide last call
    (if it hasn't already).

    The ospf-wg charter was recently debated on the ospf mailing wrt an
    update. It was also discussed extensively by me, Acee and the routing ADs
    and at the ospf-wg meeting in atlanta. The charter agreed upon does not
    include any work-item for alternate ospf-te proposals.

    Regards,
    --rohit.

    On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 20:08:20 -0500 (EST) Jim Boyle writes:
    =>
    =>So it is more of a contribution to the OSPF WG, not the TEWG?
    =>I'll ask ietf-secretary to make the corresponding changes.
    =>You might want to forward the announce message to OSPF WG.
    =>
    =>thanks,
    =>
    =>Jim