From: Acee Lindem (aceeREDBACK.COM)
Date: Mon Mar 31 2003 - 13:14:26 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Eric,

Thanks - We'll update. Also, I'm updating the punctation of
one of my statements.

Eric Rosen wrote:
> With regard to the following extract from the minutes:
>
>
>>- Acee Lindem: we have now 3 methods for loop avoidance: Route Tag, DN Bit
>> and for Intra-Area link (sham links)
>
>
>>- Eric Rosen: sham links is the preferred method (in addition to DN bit)
>
>
>>- Acee Lindem: Thus we would have two preferred methods: DN bit and sham
>> links ?
>
>
>>- Eric Rosen: For Type3/5 DN bit applies and this without impacting the
>> OSPF protocol but it would have been better to have only one mechanism
>
>
>
> I think the following would be more accurate:
>
> - Acee Lindem: we have now 3 methods for loop avoidance: Route Tag, DN Bit
> and for Intra-Area link (sham links)
>
> - Eric Rosen: route tags can be eliminated in favor of the DN bit, but sham
> links cannot be.
>
> - Acee Lindem: Thus we would have two preferred methods: DN bit and sham
> links ?
     links.

>
> - Eric Rosen: DN bit applies only to type 3/5 LSAs.
>

--
Acee

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]