From: Daniel Joyal (djoyalNORTELNETWORKS.COM)
Date: Tue Apr 29 2003 - 08:57:59 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Version -06 of the OSPFv2 MIB update includes:

- Add General group object for configuring reference bandwidth
- Change General group object ospfOpaqueLsaSupport MAX-ACCESS from
read-write to read-only
- Deprecate ospfExtLsdbTable and add ospfAsLsdbTable
- Add external route tag object to ospfAreaAggregateTable for NSSA (RFC
3101)
- Change status of RFC 1850 compliance and conformance groups from
"deprecated" to
  "current"
- Add support for Graceful Restart

Pending updates for version -07

- Configuration objects to support detection of inactive neighbors
- Resolution of issues raised by IESG's OAM expert reviewer on version -05
- Remaining open issues on traps
- Add section on MIB support for multiple OSPF instances
- Fix smilint errors/warnings
- Fix ospfStubRouterAdvertisement Description clause per Don's comment
- Change "hitless restart" to "graceful restart" per Don's comment
- Any additional issues from WG

-Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Goodspeed [mailto:dgoodspe@EXCITE.COM]
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 6:49 PM
> To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
> Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call for
> draft-ietf-ospf-mib-update-06.txt
>
>
> All,
>
> From my review of the diff's file between these two
> revisions, I have one specific comment and two general comments.
>
> 1. (specific comment) At the end of page 17, the description
> for the new ospfStubRouterAdvertisement attribute needs to
> end with a double-quote. I see an o with an umlaut above it.
>
> 2. (general comment) In the description for all of the new
> restart objects and notifications, replace the text "hitless
> restart" with "graceful restart". This reflects the recent
> name change of that draft from Acee's last update (Graceful
> OSPF Restart).
>
> 3. (general comment) All in all, the objects, their
> definitions, etc., look well thought out and well-defined.
> In my last email on this MIB, I suggested including all the
> needed items to "complete" this MIB update per most common
> implementations and per the most recent drafts. I think
> we've met this goal.
>
> Thanks for moving this forward,
> Don Goodspeed
>
> --- On Wed 04/23, Acee Lindem < acee@REDBACK.COM > wrote:
> From: Acee Lindem [mailto: acee@REDBACK.COM]
> To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:30:00 -0400
> Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call for
> draft-ietf-ospf-mib-update-06.txt
>
> We've decided do another revision of this draft prior to
> WG<br>last call. If you forward comments quickly (I don't
> have an<br>exact date), they can be incorporated into the
> next revision.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Acee<br><br>Acee Lindem
> wrote:<br>> This is the start of a Working Group last call
> for<br>> draft-ietf-ospf-mib-update-06.txt, OSPF Version 2
> Management<br>> Information Base. All comments must be
> received by Wednesday,<br>> May 7th, 2003.<br>><br>> This
> document reached the AD review phase once before but<br>> we
> decided to add MIB support for recent OSPF
> extensions.<br>><br>><br>> A URL for this Internet-Draft
> is:<br>>
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-mib-update-06.txt<br><br
><br>--<br>Acee<br>

_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]