|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Michael Dykman (mdykman
gmail.com)
Date: Tue Sep 04 2007 - 14:15:57 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Triggers are a fine idea, but I would use a trigger for both cases..
no point putting that level of housekeeping on the application when
you can set rules in the database and more or less forget about it.
- michael
On 9/4/07, Olaf Stein <steino
ccri.net> wrote:
> I would use a trigger (at least for the update)....
>
> The first insert should work with now() and you can leave lastupdateted
> empty
>
>
> Olaf
>
>
> On 9/4/07 3:01 PM, "Hiep Nguyen" <hiep
ee.ucr.edu> wrote:
>
> > Hi list,
> >
> > i tried to create a table with inserted & lastupdated timestamp fields:
> >
> > create table temp (
> > id int not null primary ke auto_increment,
> > data varchar(100),
> > inserted timestamp default now(),
> > lastupdated timestamp(8));
> >
> >
> > how do i get mysql to put in the current timestamp for inserted &
> > lastupdated fields when i insert a record and only lastupdated when i
> > update the record?
> >
> > thanks,
> > T. Hiep
> >
>
>
> --
> MySQL General Mailing List
> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
> To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=mdykman
gmail.com
>
>
--
- michael dykman
- mdykman
gmail.com
- All models are wrong. Some models are useful.
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]