From: Eric Bergen (eric.bergengmail.com)
Date: Sun Apr 18 2010 - 14:35:28 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This can become a problem when using replication. For example if you do:

begin;
insert into innodb_table;
insert into myisam_table;
insert into innodb_table;
rollback;

The innodb rows won't be replicated but the myisam row will. There is
more info at:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/innodb-and-mysql-replication.html

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Jigal van Hemert <jigalxs4all.nl> wrote:
> Tompkins Neil wrote:
>>
>> Just looking for some confirmation that under a single database - I assume
>> it is perfectly normal to have both MyISAM and InnoDB engines for
>> different
>> tables ?  Is there anything I need to be aware of ?
>
> In most case no problems. MySQL can mix engines without problems.
> Every engine uses it's own specific buffers, so if your database becomes big
> and memory becomes an issue (large buffers needed) it might be handy to use
> only one engine (so you can set the buffers for the other engine(s) to a
> very low number).
> On a daily basis I use databases with mixed MyISAM and InnoDB tables.
>
> --
> Jigal van Hemert.
>
> --
> MySQL General Mailing List
> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
> To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=eric.bergengmail.com
>
>

--
Eric Bergen
eric.bergengmail.com
http://www.ebergen.net

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]