From: Roland Roland (R_O_L_a_N_Dhotmail.com)
Date: Thu May 31 2012 - 04:32:33 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

i agree it wouldn't cause trouble, though it might lock mysql as there's
a number of other databases running on the same server.
so performance is an issue even if it's just a CPU/RAM peak.

On 5/31/12 11:23 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 31.05.2012 09:13, schrieb Roland RoLaNd:
>> Dear all,I have a task to anonymize data in 82000
>> record (for the time being)i've tested my script against
>> about 30 of them, and it takes about 2.4 sec for each
>> query to be executed.
> provide table structure and query example
> sounds like a bad design without key
>
> how can 30 updates take 2.4 seconds?
>
>> i'm seeking help with the following:
>> - what's the best way to run such a script without affecting the DB server performance?
>> Should i limit the script to implement N number of records at a time?
>> and then sleep or is there a better way?
>> - What's the best practice of handling errors and warnings in such a situation?
>> - How can i prevent the runtime errors and mysql locks?
> wrong question
>
> [--] Data in InnoDB tables: 6G (Tables: 49)
> [--] Up for: 5d 11h 17m 15s (493M q [1K qps], 43K conn, TX: 38B, RX: 14B)
> [--] Reads / Writes: 89% / 11%
>
> as you can see 30 queries or even 88.000 queries must not
> make any trouble if you table-design is OK
>

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]