|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: security sysctl? (was: r/o filesystem restrictions for firewall?)
From: Allen Briggs (briggs
ninthwonder.com)Date: Tue Oct 24 2000 - 14:01:25 CDT
- Next message: Jon Lindgren: "Re: security sysctl? (was: r/o filesystem restrictions for firewall?)"
- Previous message: Jon Lindgren: "Re: security sysctl? (was: r/o filesystem restrictions for firewall?)"
- Maybe in reply to: Jon Lindgren: "security sysctl? (was: r/o filesystem restrictions for firewall?)"
- Next in thread: Jon Lindgren: "Re: security sysctl? (was: r/o filesystem restrictions for firewall?)"
- Maybe reply: Allen Briggs: "Re: security sysctl? (was: r/o filesystem restrictions for firewall?)"
- Reply: Jon Lindgren: "Re: security sysctl? (was: r/o filesystem restrictions for firewall?)"
- Reply: Greywolf: "Re: security sysctl? (was: r/o filesystem restrictions for firewall?)"
- Reply: Thomas Michael Wanka: "Re: security sysctl? (was: r/o filesystem restrictions for firewall?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 01:45:06PM -0400, Jon Lindgren wrote:
> Then I definitely don't know exactly what securelevel 2 is. Is there a
> spot to read up on exactly what it does and what it affects?
init(8):
2 Highly secure mode - same as secure mode, plus disks are always
read-only whether mounted or not, new disks may not be mounted, and
existing mounts may only be downgraded from read-write to read-on-
ly. This level precludes tampering with filesystems by unmounting
them, but also inhibits running newfs(8) while the system is multi-
user.
The settimeofday(2) system call can only advance the time.
The state of ipf(8) (the in-kernel IP filtering facility) may not
be changed.
Downgrading from highly secure mode to insecure mode (that is, to
single-user mode) always requires the root password to be entered
on the console, whether the console is marked as 'secure' in
/etc/ttys or not.
-allen
- Next message: Jon Lindgren: "Re: security sysctl? (was: r/o filesystem restrictions for firewall?)"
- Previous message: Jon Lindgren: "Re: security sysctl? (was: r/o filesystem restrictions for firewall?)"
- Maybe in reply to: Jon Lindgren: "security sysctl? (was: r/o filesystem restrictions for firewall?)"
- Next in thread: Jon Lindgren: "Re: security sysctl? (was: r/o filesystem restrictions for firewall?)"
- Maybe reply: Allen Briggs: "Re: security sysctl? (was: r/o filesystem restrictions for firewall?)"
- Reply: Jon Lindgren: "Re: security sysctl? (was: r/o filesystem restrictions for firewall?)"
- Reply: Greywolf: "Re: security sysctl? (was: r/o filesystem restrictions for firewall?)"
- Reply: Thomas Michael Wanka: "Re: security sysctl? (was: r/o filesystem restrictions for firewall?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]