|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: ssh - are you nuts?!?
From: Simon J. Gerraty (sjg
quick.com.au)Date: Sun Dec 17 2000 - 16:01:16 CST
- Next message: matthew green: "re: ssh - are you nuts?!?"
- Previous message: Jason R Thorpe: "Re: ssh - are you nuts?!?"
- In reply to: Jason R Thorpe: "Re: ssh - are you nuts?!?"
- Next in thread: Chris Jones: "Re: ssh - are you nuts?!?"
- Reply: Simon J. Gerraty: "Re: ssh - are you nuts?!?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>There are OTP authentication mechanisms available for SSH. And an OTP
>authenticated telnet session isn't going to be encrypted, so you still
>run the risk of having your keystrokes sniffed.
Sniffing is perhaps the lesser issue. Without session integrity checks
(and encryption provides a good form), your authenticated telnet session
can be stollen from you - thus strong authentication by itself is
almost useless.
--sjg
- Next message: matthew green: "re: ssh - are you nuts?!?"
- Previous message: Jason R Thorpe: "Re: ssh - are you nuts?!?"
- In reply to: Jason R Thorpe: "Re: ssh - are you nuts?!?"
- Next in thread: Chris Jones: "Re: ssh - are you nuts?!?"
- Reply: Simon J. Gerraty: "Re: ssh - are you nuts?!?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]