|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Greg A. Woods (woods_at_weird.com)
Date: Tue Oct 15 2002 - 10:29:35 CDT
[ On Tuesday, October 15, 2002 at 20:58:49 (+0930), Brett Lymn wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: what's in a name? fingerprinted exec
>
> Yes.. I agree with all the above but I thought "fingerprinted exec"
> too cumbersome myself, some other thoughts for names I just had were:
>
> 1) secure exec
> 2) trusted exec
> 3) verified exec
I think "secure" is way too far loaded with incorrect and even
potentaily damaging connotations and (mis-)perceptions.
> At the moment I think 2 conveys what I am on about best...(but 1 means
> less changes for me ;-)
I'm not sure "trusted" is exactly right either.
I think "verified" is really more along the lines of what's being done.
-- Greg A. Woods+1 416 218-0098; <g.a.woods
ieee.org>; <woods
robohack.ca> Planix, Inc. <woods
planix.com>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <woods
weird.com>
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ieee.org>; <woods