OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Jason R. Fink (jrf_at_adresearch.com)
Date: Wed Oct 16 2002 - 10:02:42 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    > > How about "verixec"? VERIfied eXEC

    or vexec ...

    > I don't see the point of contracting the meaning right out of the words
    > just to make some silly new word which rolls off the tounge reasonably
    > easily. I think "verified exec" is perfectly fine all by itself. It
    > encapsulates the meaning of the concept without too many chances for
    > false connotations or mis-perceptions and though it already uses a bit
    > of jargon ("exec"), it doesn't invent new jargon.
    >
    > With popularity and wide-spread use some well understood contraction or
    > acronym may evolve or drift down into books and documentation just as
    > has happened with "exec". However attempting to cause its precipitation
    > before anyone can even use the tool in question is, I think, putting the
    > cart before the horse. After all I hope we're still not looking for
    > some identifier symbol name that has to fit in six characters! ;-)

    No we are not, but this involves the actual code as well and I
    do not like the idea of "verified_exec()" or "kern_verfied_exec.c"
    (the latter of which breaks a convention).

    veri_exec() and/or kern_vexec.c make more sense from a coding
    standpoint, however, the "Name itself" certainly could (should???)
    be "Verified Executables."

            Jay

    -- 
    Jay Fink <http://jrf.odpn.net/>                 
    NetBSD Developer <http://www.netbsd.org/>
    Senior SysAdmin/Programmer, Ipsos <http://www.ipsos.com/>