|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: kern.showallprocs implementation
From: Bill Studenmund (wrstuden
netbsd.org)
Date: Mon Jun 28 2004 - 17:33:15 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 11:01:23AM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Rui Paulo wrote:
> > The diff is in attachment, although I'm not really sure if `cvs diff` is the
> > best way to submit diff's to the mailing list.
>
> "cvs diff -u" is far more readable.
Agreed.
> > What do you guys think ? Is it ok ?
>
> No idea - i guess it can't hurt to have it, but with standard Unix
> semantics by default, i.e. show all users' processes.
True, but there are a number of situations where something like this is
very useful. Consider a computing facility whose customers are in
competition with each other. In those cases, keeping users from seeing
other processes is a very good thing. For instance the Airbus engineers
might not want the Boeing engineers to see what simulations they are
running.
As for normal Unix behavior, my understanding is that the default will be
to show everything. :-)
Take care,
Bill
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFA4JyqWz+3JHUci9cRArlZAJ9Xz4MgIFb33Q5wlu6vLAREZckoJgCdFHG0
jroT/T9Ipxe9q4NRUQ2Tyek=
=Rmfq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]