From: Jim Wise (jwisedraga.com)
Date: Mon Apr 11 2005 - 23:40:13 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:

>On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Jim Wise wrote:
>
>> I've just done this. spamd is now pfspamd. spamdb is now pfspamdb.
>> spamd-setup is now pfspamd-setup. There _were_ no changes required to
>> the code. Period.
>>
>> Tomorrow morning, I will be committing changes to pfspamd to use
>> /etc/pfspamd.conf and /var/chroot/pfspamd, and to rename spamlogd to
>> pfspamlogd, for consistency. This requires two lines of
>> changed code under src/dist/pf. If you would like, I hereby volunteer
>> to resolve any and all conflicts which spring up in those two lines.
>
>I also don't like the name spamd. But others suggested that spamd is more
>than just for "pf". As far as I know, it can be used via inetd too. And
>also another suggested tarpitd as the name.

After some consideration, I chose `pfspamd' for two reasons:

  a.) despite the marketing talk, this code _is_ pf specific. In
      particular, while it can accept connections from any redirecting
      packet filter (obviously), it can only feed grey- and whitelisting
      data back into pf.

  b.) the name is a bit of a compromise. Mr. Yamamoto was concerned
      that users from some other OS might not be able to find spamd,
      and the name pfspamd (for `pf's spamd') makes it easier for them
      to do so, hopefully without confusing the much larger number of
      users of spamassassin's spamd.

- --
                                Jim Wise
                                jwisedraga.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCW1E4pRpI6SYACmIRAowzAKC1AlrXYzc/NLqE8tRqP2PB1bvDZgCfcLJV
Kn07s1m1WDEkLvFYJO9ZtkQ=
=7JVQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]