Re: Penetration Tests

-= ArkanoiD =- (arkmpak.convey.ru)
Fri, 26 Sep 97 22:21:21 +0300

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Bill Kennedy: "Re: Penetration tests"
• Previous message: Edward Cracknell: "Re[2]: Penetration Tests"
• In reply to: Brian Mitchell: "Re: Penetration Tests"
• Next in thread: Chuck Kenyon: "Re: Penetration Tests"

nuqneH,

> From: Darren Reed <darrenrcyber.com.au>
> Subject: Re: Penetration Tests
> To: firewall-wizardsnfr.net
> Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 14:48:12 +1000 (EST)

[dd]

> The $$ question is, how much time do you want to spend doing this and what
> that cost will be vs. buying something like ISS to do it for you.

..and will ISS really do or not. I don't like ISS tool. It missed many
old vulnerabilites and caused unnecessary alarms for things that were ok
for me. I don't think it is wise to spend big $$ on it. Ballista gives
much better impression.

---
                                       _ _ _ _ _ _ _
   Must be a visit from the dead.. _| o |_ | | _|| | / _||_| |_ |_ |_
   CU in Hell .......... Arkan#iD |_ o _||_| _||_| / _| | o |_||_||_|

• Next message: Bill Kennedy: "Re: Penetration tests"
• Previous message: Edward Cracknell: "Re[2]: Penetration Tests"
• In reply to: Brian Mitchell: "Re: Penetration Tests"
• Next in thread: Chuck Kenyon: "Re: Penetration Tests"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:08:58 CDT