|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
RE: Re: cost of frame relay snooping
dnewman
data.com
Sun, 02 Nov 97 21:37:18 -0500
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Scott Blake: "RE: port 256/257 and firewall-1"
- Previous message: Jeromie Jackson: "Re: firewalls and the incoming traffic problem"
- Next in thread: Krammes,Jim: "RE: Re: cost of frame relay snooping"
>Has anyone done any cost assessments about how much it takes to
>snoop on frame relay lines?
In addition to Ted Doty's pointers, several net management vendors have adapted
RMON probes for use on frame relay. I'm familiar with the ones from Netscout
(formerly Frontier) and Concord, and Bay (which bought Armon) and 3Com (which
bought Axon) may have something as well.
One of the RMON groups is capture, and these probes' management packages show
capture buffer contents using decodes that look the Network General Sniffer.
Speaking of the Sniffer, Network General and several other vendors (HP, RADcom,
TTC, Wandel & Goltermann) have V.35 interfaces for their analyzers. Can't vouch
for the existence quality of the frame relay decodes, though.
Regards
David Newman
Data Communications magazine
- Next message: Scott Blake: "RE: port 256/257 and firewall-1"
- Previous message: Jeromie Jackson: "Re: firewalls and the incoming traffic problem"
- Next in thread: Krammes,Jim: "RE: Re: cost of frame relay snooping"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:09:48 CDT