|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
SV: port 256/257 and firewall-1
Mattias Lindstrom (Mattias.Lindstrom
infohwy.se)
Mon, 3 Nov 1997 09:32:30 +0100
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Krammes,Jim: "RE: Re: cost of frame relay snooping"
- Previous message: Scott Blake: "RE: port 256/257 and firewall-1"
Well, correct me if I´m wrong but doesn´t FW-1 check the source adress against it table of permitted GUI clients?
If the packet comes from a non-permitted client it just discards it.
But, I could be wrong.
Mattias Lindström +46 (0)8 445 1842, +46 (0)708 46 1842 (fax)
Information Highway AB +46 (0)708 45 1842 (mobile)
Torget 1, Box 1507 mattias.lindstrom
infohwy.se
172 29 Sundbyberg
SWEDEN http://www.infohwy.se
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: Scott Blake [SMTP:blake
netegrity.com]
Skickat: Tuesday, October 28, 1997 1:40 PM
Till: Paul D. Robertson
Kopia: firewall-wizards
nfr.net
Ämne: RE: port 256/257 and firewall-1
As I said, limited testing. I've tested out of band data and a few fuzz
tests. FW-1 appears to simply ignore everything that isn't strictly
what it wants. Clearly, I don't have the definitive answer on this
subject. Perhaps someone with more time could take this ball and report
their results?
-s
Scott Blake, Network Security Architect
Netegrity, Inc.
blake
security.com
- Next message: Krammes,Jim: "RE: Re: cost of frame relay snooping"
- Previous message: Scott Blake: "RE: port 256/257 and firewall-1"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:09:48 CDT