|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: chroot useful?
Andreas Siegert (afx
ibm.de)
Tue, 11 Nov 1997 11:37:57 +0100
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Andreas Siegert: "Facts, not Fiction"
- Previous message: Bennett Todd: "Denial Of Service: is it a security issue? (was Re: Ant...)"
- In reply to: Darren Reed: "Re: Antwort: Re: Facts, not Fiction"
- Next in thread: chuck+fwwiz
yerkes.com: "Re: chroot useful?"
Quoting Joseph S. D. Yao (jsdy
cospo.osis.gov):
> And DON'T let them bring in their own fun little binaries.
If you run a system that supports a TCB shell, that can be secured as well.
Only allow the execution of programs that have the tcb bit set, then they can
ftp binaries as much as they want, they will not be able to execute them....
bye
afx
-- Andreas Siegert afxibm.de / afx
barolo.munich.de.ibm.com / AFX at IPNET PGP Key:http://www.muc.de/~afx/pubkey.asc, KeyId AB26FD05
- Next message: Andreas Siegert: "Facts, not Fiction"
- Previous message: Bennett Todd: "Denial Of Service: is it a security issue? (was Re: Ant...)"
- In reply to: Darren Reed: "Re: Antwort: Re: Facts, not Fiction"
- Next in thread: chuck+fwwiz
yerkes.com: "Re: chroot useful?"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:09:48 CDT