|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: a long response to a Short note on new Laws
Eric Budke (budke
budke.com)
Wed, 08 Jul 1998 15:20:37 -0400
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Hubert Weikert: "Re: working on a new syslogd."
- Previous message: Bennett Todd: "Re: How do you test a firewall"
- In reply to: Adam H. Pendleton: "Re: How do you test a firewall (was Re: your mail -Reply)"
- Next in thread: Technical Incursion Countermeasures: "Re: a long response to a Short note on new Laws"
- Reply: Technical Incursion Countermeasures: "Re: a long response to a Short note on new Laws"
At 10:47 PM 7/8/97 +0000, Technical Incursion Countermeasures wrote:
>In short the law will allow 'recognised professionals' to carry the tools -
>but allow the 'data cops' to arrest people suspected of committing a crime
>on the basis that they are carrying 'illegal tools' . Jus tthe same as a
>locksmith is allowed to carry lock picks, but a burglar is not..
>
>Cheers,
>
>bret
>Technical Incursion Countermeasures
The small problem is that the line of when you are a locksmith and burglar
become blurred in this business. Who when doing an internet job has hit
only upon the client and no other machines. Granted there is a
get-out-of-jail-free card from the client, but, you are still hitting these
other people w/o their consent. And it often takes getting in before you
can determine its owner.
We have clients flat out deny stuff is theirs at first glance, but give
them a few days to research it, and they come back with their tail between
their legs. To do a thorough job, you can't go solely on what info the
client gives you. I guess we are left hoping the legal department is ready
in case one of these non-clients is hit accidentally.
- Next message: Hubert Weikert: "Re: working on a new syslogd."
- Previous message: Bennett Todd: "Re: How do you test a firewall"
- In reply to: Adam H. Pendleton: "Re: How do you test a firewall (was Re: your mail -Reply)"
- Next in thread: Technical Incursion Countermeasures: "Re: a long response to a Short note on new Laws"
- Reply: Technical Incursion Countermeasures: "Re: a long response to a Short note on new Laws"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:11:32 CDT