|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
NAT on router vs. firewall
Gregory Blake (greg
healthgate.com)
Fri, 10 Jul 1998 10:46:55 -0400
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Ryan Russell: "Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? (AG vs. SPF)"
- Previous message: Harvey Nusz: "Fwd:Load Balancing using the Firewall"
- Next in thread: Neil Pike: "Re: NAT on router vs. firewall"
- Maybe reply: Neil Pike: "Re: NAT on router vs. firewall"
- Maybe reply: Bill_Royds
pch.gc.ca: "Re: NAT on router vs. firewall"
- Maybe reply: Neil Pike: "Re: NAT on router vs. firewall"
- Maybe reply: Bill_Royds
pch.gc.ca: "Re: NAT on router vs. firewall"
- Maybe reply: Neil Pike: "Re: NAT on router vs. firewall"
- Maybe reply: Bill_Royds
pch.gc.ca: "Re: NAT on router vs. firewall"
We're in the process of doing some network reconfiguration and my boss
suggested doing NAT on our router (a cisco) instead of on the firewall
(running firewall-1). It sounded like a reasonable idea to me, but I
figured I'd check here and see if there were any big issues with doing it
on one as opposed to the other.
Thanks
gregory
-- Gregory Blake HealthGate Data Corp Network Manager greghealthgate.com 781.321.6000
- Next message: Ryan Russell: "Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? (AG vs. SPF)"
- Previous message: Harvey Nusz: "Fwd:Load Balancing using the Firewall"
- Next in thread: Neil Pike: "Re: NAT on router vs. firewall"
- Maybe reply: Neil Pike: "Re: NAT on router vs. firewall"
- Maybe reply: Bill_Royds
pch.gc.ca: "Re: NAT on router vs. firewall"
- Maybe reply: Neil Pike: "Re: NAT on router vs. firewall"
- Maybe reply: Bill_Royds
pch.gc.ca: "Re: NAT on router vs. firewall"
- Maybe reply: Neil Pike: "Re: NAT on router vs. firewall"
- Maybe reply: Bill_Royds
pch.gc.ca: "Re: NAT on router vs. firewall"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Jul 17 1999 - 07:11:32 CDT